Photo Gallery

1967 Philips HPI 400W

The first commercial white-light metal halide lamps released in 1964 by GE (USA) and Osram/Radium (West Germany) were essentially high-pressure mercury lamps driven at a higher power load and dosed with a mixture of sodium, thallium and indium iodides, what would be later called the NTI or the three-band fill chemistry. The latter term refers to the fact that each of these additives radiates one of the three primary colors: indium for blue, thallium for green, and sodium for reddish-orange. The combination of those color in the right proportions results in what we perceive as white light. Beside a more effective production of white light compared to plain mercury lamps, a key advantage of this technology lies also in a light color point which can be adjusted freely via changes in the salt composition and dosage.

It is upon these principles that Philips of the Netherlands developed their HPI metal halide lamps, which were first released in 1965 in the form of 400 and 2000 W clear tubular models. The original HPI 400W shown here features a 3-part quartz burner placed in an evacuated tubular jacket whose vacuum is maintained by two large barium mirror getters. The thermal insulation conferred by vacuum and the graphite-coated conical extremities of the burner are crucial to the realization of the high salt vapor pressure needed for an efficient production of visible light. However, the low quality grade of fused quartz available at the time forced Philips (and other manufacturers) to keep the discharge power load and the burner temperature low so as to ensure a sufficiently long service life. Such constraint led to an electrode gap length of about 48 mm, which limited the discharge power load to 72 W/cm, still 41 % higher than in standard 400 W mercury lamps.

An important feature that was first introduced by Philips (C. Jacobs and H. Boort) is the side frame wire sheathed with a steatite tube. This is designed to limit the negative charging of the burner caused by photoelectron emission from polarized metal parts of the frame exposed to the UV radiation. This process is responsible for the electrolytic loss of sodium from the quartz vessel, which affects the stability of key lamp properties such as light color and the (re-) ignition voltages. The latter critically determines the durability of the lamp as a too high value of these voltage parameters cause ignition failure or the self-extinction of the arc during the run-up phase. Moreover, the argon fill in the burner makes it highly sensitive towards gaseous impurities which accumulate over time. So, Philips devised a thorough thermal treatment during production in order to properly degas all burner components, including the salt fill, which considerably improved the chemical stability of the lamp.

The HPI 400W is designed for an operation on (existing) 400 W mercury lamp gears, which were in widespread use during the 1960s. A reliable discharge ignition is realized thanks to a soft switching ignitor connected across the lamp terminals. An ignition voltage requirement below the kilovolt level is also realized via an argon fill pressure of about 15–20 mbar. The mercury dosage is optimized for a burner operation in the horizontal position with an arc voltage of 125 V and a 3.4 A drive current. While those electrical characteristics are close to those of the 400 W mercury lamp, the power factor is lower due to the shorter arc, which result in a 5 % lower power dissipation. The photometric properties are also quite different, at 30.0 klm the initial light output is 36–43 % higher, and at 610 cd/cm² the source luminance is 33 % higher compared to the clear variant of the mercury lamp (53 times higher in the case of the phosphor-coated one). Interestingly, Philips balanced the salt fill chemistry so as to produce a light color similar to that of their HPL fluorescent mercury lamps available at the time. Those were characterized by a distinctly greenish white-light output. This strategy enabled the seamless combination of HPI and HPL lamps in lighting installations and provided a boost in lumen output thanks to the strong optical emission in the green, near the eye's peak photopic sensitivity (see [url=https://trad-lighting.net/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=950]there[/url] for more information).

Although a major step forward in performances and light color quality, this first HPI 400W was also plagued by a short service life of 4000 h and by large color spread and shift throughout life. The use of an early thorium-activated electrode design and the unimpeded flow of photoelectrons in the evacuated outer bulb even caused a 12–15 % decrease in light output in the first 2000 h of operation. This lamp was eventually redesigned in 1969, resulting in the 2nd-generation HPI platform that features a compact barrel burner with a shorter electrode gap length and a neon-argon Penning fill, placed in a gas-filled outer jacket (see [url=https://trad-lighting.net/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=664]there[/url]). These upgrades effectively made the NTI-filled metal halide lamp an economically viable technology in the general lighting market.


Keywords: Lamps

1967 Philips HPI 400W


The first commercial white-light metal halide lamps released in 1964 by GE (USA) and Osram/Radium (West Germany) were essentially high-pressure mercury lamps driven at a higher power load and dosed with a mixture of sodium, thallium and indium iodides, what would be later called the NTI or the three-band fill chemistry. The latter term refers to the fact that each of these additives radiates one of the three primary colors: indium for blue, thallium for green, and sodium for reddish-orange. The combination of those color in the right proportions results in what we perceive as white light. Beside a more effective production of white light compared to plain mercury lamps, a key advantage of this technology lies also in a light color point which can be adjusted freely via changes in the salt composition and dosage.

It is upon these principles that Philips of the Netherlands developed their HPI metal halide lamps, which were first released in 1965 in the form of 400 and 2000 W clear tubular models. The original HPI 400W shown here features a 3-part quartz burner placed in an evacuated tubular jacket whose vacuum is maintained by two large barium mirror getters. The thermal insulation conferred by vacuum and the graphite-coated conical extremities of the burner are crucial to the realization of the high salt vapor pressure needed for an efficient production of visible light. However, the low quality grade of fused quartz available at the time forced Philips (and other manufacturers) to keep the discharge power load and the burner temperature low so as to ensure a sufficiently long service life. Such constraint led to an electrode gap length of about 48 mm, which limited the discharge power load to 72 W/cm, still 41 % higher than in standard 400 W mercury lamps.

An important feature that was first introduced by Philips (C. Jacobs and H. Boort) is the side frame wire sheathed with a steatite tube. This is designed to limit the negative charging of the burner caused by photoelectron emission from polarized metal parts of the frame exposed to the UV radiation. This process is responsible for the electrolytic loss of sodium from the quartz vessel, which affects the stability of key lamp properties such as light color and the (re-) ignition voltages. The latter critically determines the durability of the lamp as a too high value of these voltage parameters cause ignition failure or the self-extinction of the arc during the run-up phase. Moreover, the argon fill in the burner makes it highly sensitive towards gaseous impurities which accumulate over time. So, Philips devised a thorough thermal treatment during production in order to properly degas all burner components, including the salt fill, which considerably improved the chemical stability of the lamp.

The HPI 400W is designed for an operation on (existing) 400 W mercury lamp gears, which were in widespread use during the 1960s. A reliable discharge ignition is realized thanks to a soft switching ignitor connected across the lamp terminals. An ignition voltage requirement below the kilovolt level is also realized via an argon fill pressure of about 15–20 mbar. The mercury dosage is optimized for a burner operation in the horizontal position with an arc voltage of 125 V and a 3.4 A drive current. While those electrical characteristics are close to those of the 400 W mercury lamp, the power factor is lower due to the shorter arc, which result in a 5 % lower power dissipation. The photometric properties are also quite different, at 30.0 klm the initial light output is 36–43 % higher, and at 610 cd/cm² the source luminance is 33 % higher compared to the clear variant of the mercury lamp (53 times higher in the case of the phosphor-coated one). Interestingly, Philips balanced the salt fill chemistry so as to produce a light color similar to that of their HPL fluorescent mercury lamps available at the time. Those were characterized by a distinctly greenish white-light output. This strategy enabled the seamless combination of HPI and HPL lamps in lighting installations and provided a boost in lumen output thanks to the strong optical emission in the green, near the eye's peak photopic sensitivity (see there for more information).

Although a major step forward in performances and light color quality, this first HPI 400W was also plagued by a short service life of 4000 h and by large color spread and shift throughout life. The use of an early thorium-activated electrode design and the unimpeded flow of photoelectrons in the evacuated outer bulb even caused a 12–15 % decrease in light output in the first 2000 h of operation. This lamp was eventually redesigned in 1969, resulting in the 2nd-generation HPI platform that features a compact barrel burner with a shorter electrode gap length and a neon-argon Penning fill, placed in a gas-filled outer jacket (see there). These upgrades effectively made the NTI-filled metal halide lamp an economically viable technology in the general lighting market.

2020-09-24_Philips_SOX-E_66W.jpg 2020-09-19_Philips_Typ_57900P2106.jpg Philips_HPI_400W_-_NL_1967.jpg 2020-09-05_Philips_SDW-TF_100W.jpg 2020-08-29_Christie_CXL-45.jpg
Lamp/Fixture Information
Manufacturer:Philips
Model Reference:HPI 400W
Lamp
Lamp Type:Quartz metal halide
Filament/Radiator Type:Thermal discharge in argon, mercury and metal iodide vapors (sodium, thallium, indium)
Base:E40
Shape/Finish:Tubular clear
Service Life:4000 h
Burning Position:Horizontal
Electrical
Wattage:380 W
Voltage:125 V
Current:3.4 A
Optical
Lumen Output:30.0 / 25.0 klm (initial/mean)
Lumen Efficacy:79.0 / 65.8 lm/W (initial/mean)
Colour Temperature:4500 K
Colour Rendering Index:65 Ra8
Physical/Production
Dimensions:285L x 47Ø mm
Factory Location:Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Fabrication Date:September 1967
Application/Use:General lighting
File information
Filename:Philips_HPI_400W_-_NL_1967.jpg
Album name:Max / Lamps
Keywords:Lamps
Filesize:435 KiB
Date added:27 Sep 2026
Dimensions:1500 x 550 pixels
Displayed:214 times
DateTime Original:2009:07:05 18:05:21
Exposure Time:1/125 sec
FNumber:f/5
Flash:No Flash
Focal length:33 mm
ISO:800
Model:Canon EOS 450D
Software:Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
White Balance:1
URL:https://trad-lighting.net/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=1417
Favourites:Add to Favourites

Comment 1 to 6 of 6
Page: 1

Drew   [Sun 27 Sep 2026 at 15:15]
Interesting that they were mimicking the color of coated MV lamps, I wouldn't expect that but it makes sense. Interesting to see graphite here as well, I don't think I've seen that on a pinch-seal tube before. The coating looks abnormally shiny as well but that could be the lighting.

Why didn't they go with a probe for ignition with these? I would assume that would be the first choice since it reflects the design of MV lamps, though it may or may not eliminate the need for an ignitor.
Max   [Mon 28 Sep 2026 at 07:42]
Good question and there are several possibilities to explain that, maybe it was deemed too complex to implement as you need a switch to prevent seal failure from sodium electrolysis during operation. Note also that the end seals are much smaller than in standard mercury lamps, so there is less space for the electrical feedthrough(s). High voltage is still needed with auxiliary probes due to the low open-circuit voltage of (most) European mercury lamp ballasts, so maybe complications at end of life were deemed too problematic. Maybe they wanted to keep the main electrodes centered so as to ensure a homogeneous temperature distribution of the electrode chambers, which may have been a crucial point of the MH lamp design in early research and development works. etc... In any cases there was no shortage of problems in the early days of the technology, so keeping the lamp as simple as possible made certainly sense.

Interestingly, the probe-start MH design was adopted in larger NTI-filled lamps operating on 380-415 V circuits as this enabled a reliable ignition without the need for an electronic ignitor. For instance, that was the design of the original HRI 2000W released by Radium in 1964, a lamp that was made to retrofit 2 kW mercury lamps in existing sports floodlighting installations. Such design was still not widely adopted though (Philips never produced such probe-start lamp), and it was eventually phased out decades later as the use of electronic ignitors became the norm and enabled better lamp performances and flux maintenances (i.e., thanks to narrower electrode chambers and a higher gas fill pressure). As for medium-wattage MH lamps, Philips is certainly not the only lampmaker to have considered the problems associated with the probe-start design as this was also not widely adopted in Europe. The only 400 W probe-start NTI-filled lamp produced there that I know of is the Tungsram HgMIF 400W that you can see there. This is really an exception.
Tuopeek   [Sat 03 Oct 2026 at 21:06]
Interesting to see metal coated heat reflectors on the arc tube. Can't say I have seen halide lamps with this before. It must have been an expensive lamp. I remember halide lamps from the 70s being very expensive and not commonly used.
Max   [Sun 04 Oct 2026 at 08:44]
The end coatings of the burner are not metallic in nature but are colloidal graphite paint, something similar to aquadag. That predates the use of zirconium oxide coatings and works quite differently too. Instead of reflecting infrared radiation and/or lowering the local optical emissivity of the arc tube wall, the graphite coating absorbs some of the electrode's radiant energy and so raises the local temperature. That was not really a common trick back then, only a few lamp manufacturers used that type of coating and Philips was one of them. I have several of their (very) early MH lamps with graphite-coated burners and they all look like there was an extensive amount of manual labor involved in their production... so those were certainly not cheap.
Tuopeek   [Sun 04 Oct 2026 at 10:18]
Thanks for the clarification, and the details on the use of graphite. It certainly looks more shiny than aquadag in the picture.
Max   [Sun 04 Oct 2026 at 10:35]
The different aspect is certainly due to the exposure of the coating to very high temperatures and to repeated heating cycles (i.e. on-off cycles of the lamp) which have caused changes in the material's crystallographic structure. Aquadag(-like) coatings are normally not subjected to such treatment. This actually reminds me of General Electric's "GEM" carbon filaments which were made from carbonized cellulose (1904 to 1911). Those special filaments differed from the standard ones by the much higher temperature of their treatment. The final aspect of their surface is very shiny, much more so than that of standard carbon filaments, a direct result of the graphitization of the carbon material.

Comment 1 to 6 of 6
Page: 1